Well as an ISTJ I would seek to avoid an argument, but as arguments are often unavoidable I will take a position.
And like a typical ISTJ, the argument will come down to "what are the facts"?
And if the facts indicate that compromise and accommodation will mean ignoring the facts (this sounds to me more like a "feeling" reaction than a "thinking" reaction, and a "perception" reaction rather than a "judgement" reaction frankly), then I will offer nothing by way of compromise or accommodation. Stubbornly and quietly maybe (introspection being what is), but without fear or favour.
Tony Sh (not verified)says...
Well as an ISTJ I would seek to avoid an argument, but as arguments are often unavoidable I will take a position.
And like a typical ISTJ, the argument will come down to "what are the facts"?
And if the facts indicate that compromise and accommodation will mean ignoring the facts (this sounds to me more like a "feeling" reaction than a "thinking" reaction, and a "perception" reaction rather than a "judgement" reaction frankly), then I will offer nothing by way of compromise or accommodation. Stubbornly and quietly maybe (introspection being what is), but without fear or favour.