It was revealed to me upon reading this article that it was biased, in favour of extroverts, "who may be innovators as well" and INTJs who while they're "dependable" rather than "brilliant" have ideas that "stand the test of time", as if to suggest that those of INTPs seldom or never do, taking recourse to what every dog in the MBTI community "knows", that INTPs are impulsive and whimsical, that they never get things done because they lack discipline and spoke, with regard to INTJs, as though to apologise for their lack of creativity as though this were a given, you have throughout the article spoke about INTPs in a manner which suggested that you wished them to modify their behaviour which is, you should recall, the very antithesis of opposition, of rebellion. The article is more about defending the derided extroverts and oft-overlooked INTJs than anything. The reason being, you are an INTJ and your husband is an ENTJ. Your feelings have clouded your rationality and, worst of all, polluted the information. A grave error indeed.
Saucy (not verified)says...
It was revealed to me upon reading this article that it was biased, in favour of extroverts, "who may be innovators as well" and INTJs who while they're "dependable" rather than "brilliant" have ideas that "stand the test of time", as if to suggest that those of INTPs seldom or never do, taking recourse to what every dog in the MBTI community "knows", that INTPs are impulsive and whimsical, that they never get things done because they lack discipline and spoke, with regard to INTJs, as though to apologise for their lack of creativity as though this were a given, you have throughout the article spoke about INTPs in a manner which suggested that you wished them to modify their behaviour which is, you should recall, the very antithesis of opposition, of rebellion. The article is more about defending the derided extroverts and oft-overlooked INTJs than anything. The reason being, you are an INTJ and your husband is an ENTJ. Your feelings have clouded your rationality and, worst of all, polluted the information. A grave error indeed.