I mean, you are not giving groundbreaking information here, rather rehashing what people who criticise the MBTI like to peruse about: "It's grooming you into answering for a certain type.'' ...Really? If this test was geared to churn out intuitives, you would have more of them in the statistics of the general population, don't you think?
Also, don't confuse online PRESENCE with dominance of intuitives. A lot of the people who are online are there as a "relief" from the external world and its flurry of commitments, financial burden, social expectations and sensory overload. Most of them are definite, introverts, not necessarily intuitives or even thinkers. Some of them only post sporadically (i.e comment sections of any online publication), others consider an online forum some sort of private club where they can gather anytime of the day (i.e reddit, quora, etc).
Overall, this article was pointless and useless. "It doesn't matter", just like you concluded.
Nach (not verified)says...
What this article even encessary?
I mean, you are not giving groundbreaking information here, rather rehashing what people who criticise the MBTI like to peruse about: "It's grooming you into answering for a certain type.'' ...Really? If this test was geared to churn out intuitives, you would have more of them in the statistics of the general population, don't you think?
Also, don't confuse online PRESENCE with dominance of intuitives. A lot of the people who are online are there as a "relief" from the external world and its flurry of commitments, financial burden, social expectations and sensory overload. Most of them are definite, introverts, not necessarily intuitives or even thinkers. Some of them only post sporadically (i.e comment sections of any online publication), others consider an online forum some sort of private club where they can gather anytime of the day (i.e reddit, quora, etc).
Overall, this article was pointless and useless. "It doesn't matter", just like you concluded.